Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0605619990060010096
Journal of Korean Society of Biological Psychiatry
1999 Volume.6 No. 1 p.96 ~ p.101
Efficacy and Tolerability of Moclobemide Compared with Amitriptyline in Dysthymic Disorder
1À̹μö/1Min Soo Lee
1³²Á¾¿ø/1Â÷ÁöÇö/1±è¿ë±¸/2À¯½ÂÈ£/1Jong Won Nam/1Ji Hyun Cha/1Young Ku Kim/2Seung Ho Ryu
Abstract
Background : Since dysthymia begins in late childhood or adolescence and has a
chronic course, long-term pharmacotherapy may be required. New generation
antidepressant, moclobemide, with more acceptable side effect profiles, is effective in the
treatment of dysthymia. The main objective of this study was to determine whether
they exhibit comparable efficacy and tolerability in dysthymia to amitriptyline.
Method and materials : The efficacy and tolerability of the moclobemide and
amitriptyline, were compared in a eight-week single-centre double-blind study in
patients(n=37) with dysthymia using he HAMD-17, the Clinical Global Impression
Scale(CGI), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS), Efficacy
Index-Therapeutic Index(EITE), 4-point Index Side Effect Scale(4-PISES), and Efficacy
Index-Side Effect Scale(EISE).
Results : A total of 37 patients entered the study, 19 were randomly assigned to the
moclobemide group and 18 to be amitriptyline group. Demographic and illness
characteristics were similar in both groups.
There were no significant difference between two groups at the total 17-HDRS score,
the HAMD-17% improvement, the total MADRS score, CGI response, and the EITE. In
the comparison of EISE between two groups, the scores of the moclobemide group were
relatively lower than the amitriptylinen group in full treatment. And the differences were
significant(moclobemide group 1.39¡¾0.61 ; amitriptyline group 2.00¡¾0.85, p<.001). At the
4-PISE. There was no serious or treatment threatening side effects. And there was no
specific difference in side effects between two groups.
The moclobemide group reported higher EIR scores than the amitriptyline group at
every follow up day, but the differences were not significant. And there was no
significant differences in the scores of five HRQOL subcategories which is compared
between two groups at every follow up days.
Conclusions : In terms of 17-HDRS and MADRS, moclobemide and amitriptyline are
equally effective at least in allevating dysthymic symptoms. But moclobemide tended to
be less troubling and better tolerated than amitriptyline. Therefore, moclobemide
treatment can be used as a safe, and higher satisfactory treatment strategy for the
dysthymia.
KEYWORD
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø